One approach to building an innovation’s value proposition is to “get out of the building”, talk with prospective customers, and discover what they need.1 Another approach is to hold off talking to customers until you’re ready to launch the new product. “It’s not the customers’ job to know what they want. It takes a long time to pull out of customers what they really want”.2
I find merging both points of view works well for testing innovative ideas associated with business-to-business specialty products. It works because specialty products’ value chains, while complex, contain clearly identifiable decision-making buyers. These decision-makers when interviewed by a person skilled in elicitation go beyond a commonplace listing of features. They express latent needs and rich insights on what they really want the new product to do. They take on the Professor role as long as the interviewer stays in the Intelligent Pupil role.
“Get out of the building” and listen
Talking one-on-one with prospective customers and discovering what they need and will buy, takes time and skill. Often people who are responsible for developing an innovative concept … R&D, marketing, and business managers … don’t have the time.
Making time to elicit latent needs and insights is a problem for people who already have major global travel and management responsibilities. Now, besides these responsibilities, they must add lengthy preparation to get the most out of each interview.
Instead of primary research work, they rely on secondary sources. One such source, multi-client market research reports give estimates of the size of the market and commonplace lists of wanted features. However, multi-client reports offer little insight into what is so valuable in your concept that users would switch to your new product and abandon what they are using.
Dig deep, dig fast
Interviewers using elicitation can dig deep to get respondents to reveal what they know, feel, think, or believe. They discover valuable insights, latent needs, and new opportunities the innovative concept might satisfy.
Skilled interviewers detect hidden patterns in a conversation and draw out what the respondent is hesitant to say. They collect information that is not readily available and do so without raising suspicion that they are guiding the conversation.
I prefer the phone for elicitation interviews. You can dig globally, fast. You can cold-call interview most decision-makers in the value chain within a few hours of identifying them. And, despite hype about face-to-face interviews letting you reading a person like a book, it’s easier to detect and elicit hidden information by listening rather than looking.3
Follow the Rule of 40
Interviews with 40 decision-makers, randomly chosen from a list of 200 or more decision-makers in the concept’s value chain, will collect more than 95% of the features needed by prospective customers. (The Central Limit Theorem of statistics underpins this rule-of-thumb. It uses two tools of statistics, probability and proper sampling of potential decision-makers.4)
When I’ve taught the tool of elicitation for testing new product concepts, I’ve noticed novice users stop after 5-8 interviews. Often they stop because the unexpectedly rich information they’ve unearthed at in a few interviews makes them feel they done enough to test the concept. Often they have other job responsibilities that relentlessly limit the time they can spend interviewing. Often they don’t have the strong curiosity that helps marketing researchers move productively through the discipline of the Rule of 40.
- Steve Blank developed his ”Get out of the Building” Customer Discovery process to talk with prospective customers and discover what they need.